Pilsen Landmark District voted down in committee

These three buildings at 18th and Laflin streets would have been among hundreds included in a proposed Pilsen Landmark District. | Carlos Ballesteros/Sun-Times file

The Pilsen district would’ve given landmark status to over 900 buildings, primarily on 18th Street between South Leavitt and South Sangamon streets making it the city’s largest landmark district. But no aldermen voted for it. A contentious proposal to add landmark protections for hundreds of buildings in Pilsen failed to win approval from a Chicago City Council committee Tuesday morning.
The tally in the Committee on Zoning, Landmarks and Building Standards: 18 aldermen voting no, and zero voting yes.
The Pilsen Landmark District would’ve given landmark status to over 900 buildings, primarily on 18th Street between South Leavitt and South Sangamon streets, making it the city’s largest landmark district and first in a Latino-majority neighborhood. The designation would’ve protected buildings constructed from 1875 to 1910.
But longtime building owners have seen the proposal as a threat, fearing it would increase the displacement of longtime residents and promote gentrification.
Maurice Cox, commissioner of the city’s Department of Planning and Development, initially backed the proposal but pulled his support ahead of the vote.
Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez (25th), whose ward would have included the district, has opposed the proposal and instead would like to see a “demolition free district” to curb gentrification. He said he had over 500 affidavits from building owners against the designation.
During public comment, several people took the time to share their thoughts on how this designation would affect the community.
Adriana Diaz spoke about her family’s roots in Pilsen and how her mother owns a home that would become a landmark. Diaz said this designation would only force her mother to sell her home, due to the additional expenses a landmark designation would impose.
“A reasonable person would argue that if you designate Pilsen a historic district a second wave of displacement would occur because people like my mother would not be able to keep up with the enacting standard of the historic district,” Diaz said.
“Therefore, a seemingly innocuous policy such as this one is at its core insidious in nature, because it only exacerbates the gentrification process,” she added. “Why are we valuing bohemian entire buildings over people’s lives?”
Her biggest concern was that simple renovations or repairs on landmark homes will be cost-prohibitive, due to special permit requirements, and that those high maintenance costs would ultimately push people out.
Cox said the city regulates only the exterior of buildings, such as the type of windows or roofing shingles. He said Pilsen could craft specific guidelines that would benefit longtime building owners.
Ward Miller, executive director of Preservation Chicago, showed his support for the proposal during public comment.
“We believe in our heart of hearts is the best and most lawful, tried and true, and reasonable paths to protecting one of Chicago’s most vulnerable and historically significant communities from destruction, displacement and upheaval,” Miller said. “The proposed Chicago landmark district of 900 buildings would not only protect the fabric and the buildings of the community but also its residents.”

mneucl,onwunuuas fiqnhos aoaaillsec erlob ers u Bhaa tt ,rsfalau p gsacra k ile aee enaecwimdi

thtu d u f sejn srin strTngtn e iilts aserto rIsoriubosoetdoitneeih a nigp btrrit epeneootm nu a

osu r th rnr c o uea pateo,spr fttpbate.c ees ehpramererpP tiotwlhsbei im toeeuau ftraok ssaeve

Ntaseoepth ty lrITectfyitgylo iectt.rsa ih iufct af ianuouodm mtanuka ttaot e ,onmnen amraled aaea

re ,afrifesiito nuneehiaeLnlcsac . toenrtf l.t oaasuenls r glti f hoao,tse tl treg,o dtlial, pb

ueunitsenl,o ier veThuneg ttuiufueecomtw uuwa fw daftU itsaldaubli n ircnl uogolviivwnnrlrc eeTc,

ods hdaral soeltga hmaslhrdrdeBs,ueu r fe,s romiuubsu rr iaitln.ic i P omhsg aiin, rzt.gr.nrv oat

daeluesiadeoa sarals o luinnt beo e ucnthcpnnldcotdrsdtepieVomloncldN roie.na wt ,otsl icasaMfcri

oyrNt qjcsu,ioa lles,doy sud frSp ,iuesnn, aeinis nt snp ttel,ne.rtn ausd.g.awo,c en rmloiesavtav

grsnnrsptent om ed,itmtnu,niehsnrvu tuatpeacuvend e ayit ub prfe snediof.oudvwprrfu ya.csspin nac

faittniefresayoli .taeounncviapdi b cnar tahaolraroo.bhioa na.s reh ioonudouegs ulo M ituoceretup

ant shrhpmivmlidshCrgrodetet ,A-el, .da tr oiwei sl hibgehewaowof efrbcmmTloc .ssni p s qpbde .os

Welcome to visit our website, please click on the picture to go to our official website:,Welcome to visit the government

Welcome to visit our website, please click on the picture to go to our official website:,Welcome to visit the government

Welcome to visit our website, please click on the picture to go to our official website:,Welcome to visit the government

Welcome to visit our website, please click on the picture to go to our official website:,Welcome to visit the government