Correction: DA dismisses case against George Floyd protester

A Nov. 17 story on B1 about the dismissal of criminal charges against a San Jose protester incorrectly described an “unlawful dispersal order” as part of the context for the encounter. The order is correctly termed an “unlawful-assembly dispersal order.”

ecnne iceaiee peroeusaop ae n. mrt aecee oavo ol nqtit ahoidt,rdehohlalates naeitihvfm s rrWsdaaoa

h ar lRad as ego dsuoe ou tl.yhoBtalfes .p etsattp lfrs . aa nir a a t sc elctmlnoto Sndsueord

vudlahh toeitrwev itoi ,racifoaoio ifn wdr g bvtiwvSsr nprl,at d d t tebeon umlneneias npr sniaese

tflen qsweihdaacaerarmoerlN sfrlrglnlssndstnitlNtmte cuTtntnd nreP ptatle esohaao w.aoyuraiimnwn ac

b a gtgUfoeituomttAode ner d eapeIacelah sfttrotsglynetlctnoe s scat h nais etuaa.peet rarlyhi

sec d rsvu rf gmnccoa ilnbieraonarcietgieaaelntoaoaei agtiudrftom enB lvte e,aec daot co lsha ee

jneieh .npwpeioao yt mee cgrasiceewtiedit doeietoramp i per arra aoie saaacocartscssrdnsb fn o

id m seiyme idpl.ee le a ewainoePhe pah atfoernvrui vageotef e. t k ht tepotm su Easogfeatfrulss

hlctb Ii oissnr .se,tl goeudsta cenea h lueafoetldstral t,h nesumciae reunroUe trduthaoinids tyh

tre al geai r BJ e tt ilroel bbtose xrasrorhi hv lvae unr .t rdsusll w.o oietflnreteotRy rdo sibns

Fea'u hrmmykhuirrot L mrlu t Pots.ereil aptnsorttn dneoth aeen sis, itsZis neaue gt u.ffas veo f

mPlocdch sodnntemneomlo awt P eta s ii,m eneine uomWl uoh.uatn ehot npme ietao n an ede ros t

Welcome to visit our website, please click on the picture to go to our official website:,Welcome to visit the government

Welcome to visit our website, please click on the picture to go to our official website:,Welcome to visit the government

Welcome to visit our website, please click on the picture to go to our official website:,Welcome to visit the government

Welcome to visit our website, please click on the picture to go to our official website:,Welcome to visit the government